Corvic AICorvic AI

Cybersecurity

Have cited answers ready before your next shift handover

Your alerts, scan exports, advisories, policies and tickets sit in different tools. Corvic reads them where they land and answers each team's questions. Every line links to the row, page or message it came from.

Accounts are free. No credit card needed.

Or find your team
Built forSecurity operationsIncident responseVulnerability managementGRC and auditThreat intelligenceMSSPs and MDR

The shared problem

Every security team copies evidence between tools by hand

The SIEM, the scanner, the ticket queue and the policy folder each hold part of the answer. People export, paste and retype to put it together. That work grows faster than headcount.

01

More alerts and findings than people

73% of detection teams name false positives as their top challenge and 59% name a lack of skilled staff (SANS, 2025). 48,185 CVEs were published in 2025. Analysts close the same benign alerts while the scan backlog grows.

02

The evidence sits in 83 tools

The average organization runs 83 security tools from 29 vendors (IBM and Palo Alto Networks, 2025). One question about one host can mean an EDR export, a scanner CSV, a Jira ticket and a Slack thread.

03

Reports get rebuilt every cycle

69% of SOCs still report metrics manually or mostly manually (SANS, 2025). Teams spend about 6 hours a week on vendor security reviews (Vanta, 2024). Board decks, client reports and questionnaires start from a blank page each time.

Who it's for

Six security teams, one cited view of the evidence

Pick your team to see the documents Corvic reads, the jobs it takes off your list and where to go next.

Security operations

Full page

SOC managers, Tier 1 to 3 analysts, threat hunters, detection engineers

Related alerts land as separate tickets, and the same benign rule fires every night. Case notes and handovers are written from memory at the end of a shift.

  • Group alerts that share an account, host or IP into one case
  • Rank analytics rules by benign closures for weekly tuning
  • Draft KQL hunts your analyst reads before they run (Microsoft Sentinel and Defender)
See the security operations page

Incident response

IR leads, forensic analysts, CISOs, outside counsel

The timeline lives in EDR exports, sign-in logs, a war room channel and a dozen tickets. Someone rebuilds it by hand for the CISO, counsel and the insurer.

  • Order events from exports, chat and tickets into one cited timeline
  • Draft the after-action report in your template
  • Answer counsel's questions with links to the log rows
See how Virtual Memory links evidence

Vulnerability management

Vulnerability analysts, infrastructure owners, security engineers

Scanner exports don't match the asset list, and only 9% of scanned vulnerabilities get fully fixed (Verizon DBIR, 2025). Deciding what to patch first means joining spreadsheets.

  • Join scan findings with asset owners and internet exposure
  • Flag findings on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities list with their due dates
  • Keep the open-findings table current after every scan
See how Data Pipelines keep tables current

GRC and audit

GRC managers, compliance analysts, security architects

A 300-question SIG or CAIQ arrives with a sales deadline. The answers exist across policies, the SOC 2 report and past questionnaires, but nobody can find the page fast.

  • Draft questionnaire answers from your policies and past responses
  • Link each answer to the policy section or report page behind it
  • Pull audit evidence from Jira and Google Drive into one request list
See how Document Lens reads policies

Threat intelligence

CTI analysts, threat hunters, SOC leads

Advisories arrive as PDFs and blog posts. Pulling the IOCs and techniques into a table, then checking them against your own alerts, takes the morning.

  • Extract IOCs and ATT&CK technique IDs from advisory PDFs
  • Check each IOC against last week's alerts and DNS logs
  • Send a cited briefing to Slack when a new advisory lands
See how Playbooks run on a schedule

MSSPs and MDR

SOC directors, service delivery managers, client success leads

Each client has its own workspace, tickets and SLAs. The monthly report for every client is assembled by an analyst who should be on the queue.

  • Draft each client's monthly report from their own tickets and alerts
  • Flag SLA misses with the ticket that caused them
  • Keep each client's data in a separate source with its own permissions
See client dashboards on Web Apps

Try it

Pick a team and see the cited answer

Each team asks one question it handles every week. Corvic reads that team's sources and answers with a link to each row, page or message. The data is a sample from fictional companies.

SOC lead, Harbor Point Logistics

Question

Group last night's alerts that share an account, host or IP.

Sources read

  • alerts.jsonElasticsearch
  • Closed ticketsJira

Corvic's answer

38 alerts became 2 cases and 4 singles. Case B is a backup job your team has closed as benign 11 times.

CaseLinked byAlerts
A. Spray to mailbox rulej.alvarez, 203.0.113.475
B. Nightly backup jobhp-ops-srv07, rule HP-11229
SinglesNo shared entity4
  1. [1]alerts.json rows 88 to 125
  2. [2]Jira SEC-1201 and SEC-1207 closure notes
OutputTwo case notes and a tuning ticket for rule HP-112

How Corvic helps

Four parts of Corvic your security teams use

Corvic reads exports and stores your tools already write to. You keep your SIEM, scanner and GRC tool.

Document Lens

Reads advisory PDFs, questionnaires, pen test reports and SOC 2 reports. Turns each one into rows you can query, with the page and paragraph kept.

Learn more

Virtual Memory

Links accounts, hosts, IPs, CVEs and tickets across sources in a knowledge graph. An analyst asks about one host and sees every alert, finding and ticket that touches it.

Learn more

Playbooks

Runs recurring work the same way every time. A Monday rule-tuning list, a daily advisory check or a monthly client report, on a schedule.

Learn more

Agent Harness

Pick the model per task, including open-source models or your own endpoint. Agents only see the sources each analyst is allowed to see.

Learn more

Proof

Published research, and results from log-heavy work

Corvic's security result is a research paper with the University of Virginia. The other two are customer results in other industries with the same shape of work: many logs and tickets, one cited answer.

0.987

Syntax accuracy turning analyst questions into KQL (UVA DART Lab paper)

Up to 10x

Lower token cost than GPT-5 in the same paper

20x

Faster issue detection across unified manufacturing logs (manufacturing)

20x

Faster ticket resolution for a top 10 electronics brand (client support)

Research results as reported in Muzammil et al., arXiv 2512.06660 (2025). Customer results are from Corvic case studies outside security.

Read the SOC research note

Small language models drafting KQL on Microsoft's Defender dataset, and how it carries over to Sentinel.

Read the log investigation case study

How a manufacturer joined machine logs and inspection reports to detect issues 20x faster.

Read the support ticket case study

Tickets matched to manuals, FAQs and product logs for a top 10 electronics brand, live in 3 months.

Security

Built to pass your own vendor security review

You review vendors for a living. Here is what goes in our file.

SOC 2 Type II

Corvic holds a SOC 2 Type II report. Ask for it during your vendor review.

Private VPC deployment

Run Corvic in a private VPC. Tenants are isolated from each other.

Your keys, encrypted data

Customer-dedicated key management. AES-256 encryption at rest and TLS 1.2+ in transit.

Zero-retention model options

Choose models with zero-data-retention options where the provider supports them.

Access per person and per source

An analyst sees the sources they are cleared for. An MSSP analyst sees only assigned clients.

SSO and removal on demand

Sign in with SSO. Corvic is GDPR and CCPA compliant, and your data can be removed on demand.

Common concerns

What security leaders ask before a pilot

That works. Corvic reads the exports and stores your tools already write to, such as AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage, Elasticsearch and Kafka, plus Jira, Slack and GitHub. Only the KQL drafting job is Microsoft specific, because that is where our published research is.

You don't have to. Corvic sits next to them and answers questions across their outputs. Analysts still run queries, close tickets and sign off in the tools they use today.

Every answer links to the row, page or message it came from. A reviewer clicks through to the alert, the scan line or the policy paragraph before anything goes to a customer or auditor.

Deploy Corvic in a private VPC with customer-dedicated keys and tenant isolation. You choose the model, including open-source models or your own endpoint. Tell us your data residency requirements and we will scope the deployment to them.

You don't need to. We onboard you with your own data, and your first answer is 24 hours away. Most pilots start with one team and one source, like last month's alert export or your current questionnaire.

Bring one export and one question per team

Send an alert export, a scan file and the questionnaire on your desk. We connect them and answer your teams' questions with a source on every line.

Accounts are free. No credit card needed.

See the security operations page